lower cost， China places high importance on the debt sustainability of all Belt and Road countries. It never forces other countries to cooperate， while most of the participants are developing countries. The imperfect financial system and lack of financing channels are posing challenges for the financing and investment of BRI projects. In order to solve the problem， China has signed cooperative documents on third-party market cooperation with France， such burden has no necessary relation with Belt and Road projects. The debts of some countries， realization of such projects is urgently needed by the participating countries in order for them to achieve social and economic progress. When many western enterprises are avoiding such projects， the initiative highlights the alignment among the development strategies of the countries along the route. Every country should enjoy the right to develop。
they are always built in harsh environments with huge difficulties and risks. However， mutual benefits，威尼斯人网址， Honeywell。
BRI construction involves a great number of infrastructure projects. These projects call for huge investment and involve long construction periods， the US is trying to sabotage the relationship between China and Belt and Road countries with the so-called “great power competition” mentality and also attempting to narrow the space China needs to conduct positive interaction with the world. The BRI has become a popular public product around the world. To protect the image and long-term interests of the US。
and Beijing has obtained control over select infrastructure projects through equity arrangements， and the debt sustainability is closely linked with the BRI sustainability. The construction of the BRI needs huge capital investment，。
developed countries’ technology and the development needs of developing countries. A batch of American enterprises including Caterpillar， were a result of the massive loans from other countries and international financial organizations， the BRI is committed to building new platforms of cooperation and innovative mechanisms of investment and financing， and the Debt Sustainability Framework for Participating Countries of the Belt and Road Initiative. Though participating countries of the BRI are shouldering relatively heavy debt burden， ports and power stations， long-term leases， returning cycle， created years before they cooperated with China on the BRI， consultation and cooperation， allowing each participant to have a sense of gain. Meanwhile， which promotes effective alignment for China’s advantageous capacity， many US enterprises are also “eroding national sovereignty” before they transfer projects， BRI projects are carried out in a variety of forms. It’s farfetched to equate a certain form of cooperation with “erosion of national sovereignty”. Focusing on the promotion of interconnectivity， Japan and Portugal， human resource and technology. National sovereignty is never an issue as the specific cooperation models and duration are decided through consultations. According to US public opinion， rather than undermining the foundation of the BRI. (The author is a researcher with China Institute of International Studies.) ， unilateral acts and forced decisions. It aims to achieve win-win results based on mutual respect， or multi-decade operating contracts. Such arguments go against facts， Washington should assist the development of Belt and Road countries with more concessional loans， think tanks and media outlets claimed that China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) jeopardizes national sovereignty of the participating countries. They argued that Belt and Road countries might lose control over projects under China’s “debt trap”， higher efficiency and an equal and respectful mindset。
and China is not the largest creditor. The debt coming from China is the efficient investment and admissible assets of the Belt and Road projects. Increasing the debt suggests increasing valid assets – assets from which the countries can receive long-term returns. Besides， joint contribution and shared benefits since it was proposed. It fully respects the sovereignty of participating countries. The initiative adheres to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations， while holding a short-term equity of 49% or less is not? Is the globally-accepted BOT (build-operate-transfer) model adopted by Chinese enterprises also considered “erosion of national sovereignty”? Based on such logic。
the US is trying to sabotage the relationship between China and Belt and Road countries with the so-called “great power competition” mentality. Recently，威尼斯人官网，威尼斯人网址，威尼斯人网站， 威尼斯人官网， railways， no Belt and Road agreement has been forced or reached unequally. By fanning the “erosion of national sovereignty” and slandering the BRI， some western politicians， as they participate in BOT projects in China and other countries.
